We now return to where it all began, the Garden of Eden. Most of our people dwell under the assumption that the Fall of Adamic (white) man occurred when Eve responded to a talking snake by eating a piece of fruit. Yet is this really about a snake and a piece of fruit? A closer look at the Scriptures reveals much more evidence of 'foul play,' with ongoing genetic implications.
In Matthew 13, we saw where Yahshua (Jesus) Christ instructed that the truth of this event was in fact, a mystery hidden from the foundation of the world. Yet what would be mysterious about Eve eating fruit? From two other Scriptures (John 8:44 and I John 3:12), along with Christ's expression and interpretation of The Parable of the Wheat and the Tares we have already seen, what's concealed in the Old Testament is indeed revealed in the New Testament, especially when it comes to the Garden of Eden! It will become even clearer from the Scriptures, that the Fall was brought on by sex in the Garden between Eve and another, before she was with Adam. Until this truth and its foundational significance are realized, the Scriptures as a whole cannot be understood. Plus, you'll continue to think and live within the world's false paradigm.
1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? 2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. 4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. 6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. 7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. 8 And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden. 9 And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? 10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself. 11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? 12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. 13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. 14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: 15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. 16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
The "serpent" appeared to Eve in the Garden of Eden. Realize, this serpent cannot be just a snake, but an intelligent, upright being. The word serpent means to whisper a (magic) spell... enchanter... from Strong's Exhaustive Concordance #5173. We also don't see the serpent's belly to the ground until after the Fall as a part of the curse in Genesis 3 verse 14. This serpent, this upright enchanter is none other than satan:
7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, 8 And prevailed not; neither was there place found any more in heaven. 9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
In Revelation chapter 12 we read of the War in Heaven, when Michael and the loyal angels of the Almighty, defeated the angels who rebelled against Yahweh God. When it speaks of "that old serpent, called the Devil and Satan" in Revelation 12, we don't think of an actual snake, and neither should we in Genesis 3. He was an enchanter. Also in Revelation 12:9, the rebellious angels lost their place in Heaven and were cast down to the earth. Therefore satan appeared to Eve as an upright enchanter, not as a slithering snake.
In Genesis chapter 3 and verse 1, we read that the "serpent" was "more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made." The word "subtil" means cunning or crafty (usually, in a bad sense). So it was a crafty enchanter which appeared to Eve in the Garden. Plus, we also may assume with the added phrase "which the LORD God had made" that there must've been others dwelling upon the earth which were not "made" directly by Yahweh God, but were ungodly corruptions.
What we have in Genesis chapter 3 is an historical event depicted in symbolic form. The "tree of knowledge of good and evil" was not an actual tree. The tree of knowledge of good and evil first spoken of in Genesis 2:9, is symbolic of a pre-Adamic 'family tree' or race somewhere in proximity of the Garden. We know this since Cain went to "the land of Nod, on the east of Eden," got a wife, later built a city, and named it after his son (Genesis 4:16-17). Cain finding a wife is rock solid proof that there were others here before Adam.
It also wasn't just a coincidence when God commands Adam to not "eat" of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and immediately in the next verse, God promises to make him a wife (Genesis 2:17-18). So obviously, there were others there, available for his consideration, however Adam recognized they were not of his kind (Genesis 2:20). Here are some examples of how trees are used in a figurative sense to describe people, races, and nations:
3 Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar in Lebanon with fair branches, and with a shadowing shroud, and of an high stature; and his top was among the thick boughs. 4 The waters made him great, the deep set him up on high with her rivers running round about his plants, and sent out her little rivers unto all the trees of the field. 5 Therefore his height was exalted above all the trees of the field, and his boughs were multiplied, and his branches became long because of the multitude of waters, when he shot forth. 6 All the fowls of heaven made their nests in his boughs, and under his branches did all the beasts of the field bring forth their young, and under his shadow dwelt all great nations. 7 Thus was he fair in his greatness, in the length of his branches: for his root was by great waters. 8 The cedars in the garden of God could not hide him: the fir and the chestnut trees were not like his branches: nor any tree in the garden of God was like unto him in his beauty. 9 I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: so that all the trees of Eden, that were in the garden of God, envied him.
19 But I was like a lamb or an ox that is brought to the slaughter; and I knew not that they had devised devices against me, saying, Let us destroy the tree with the fruit thereof, and let us cut him off from the land of the living, that his name may be no more remembered.
10 And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
In Genesis 3:3 the tree of knowledge of good and evil was the "tree" that Adam and Eve weren't supposed to "touch". Actual trees possess no knowledge of good and evil. In Ezekiel 31:9 it said (in reference to the vast Assyrian Empire) that "all the trees of Eden, that were in the Garden of God, envied him." Literal trees can't envy anything. The passage in Genesis chapter 3, as is in other places throughout the Scriptures, use trees as symbolic of people, families, and nations. In Proverbs 11:30, 13:12, and 15:4, the phrase “tree of life” is symbolic of a source of preservation. At the end in Revelation 22:14, we find “the tree of life” mentioned again, and it is reserved for those who shall be permitted entry into the new Jerusalem, the city which descends from heaven, all in symbolic form.
In John 15:1-7 Christ tells us that He is the True Vine and explains that those who abide in Him are the branches. In John 6:31-51 Christ explains that He is the Bread of Life and that those who eat such bread shall live forever. We know that Christ is not an actual vine or loaf of bread. But these are familiar things being used in a symbolic sense to illustrate actual, historical realities to us. The only viable conclusion is that Yahshua Christ is the 'tree of life.' Therefore those descendants of Adam who abide in and keep the ways of God thru Christ, are given to remain a part of that symbolic tree, thereby bringing forth righteous fruit (John 15:5-8).
The purpose of fruit is to produce more trees of the same kind. Even today, families are spoken of as 'trees,' as they grow or 'branch out,' their various elements are called 'roots' and 'branches.' Obeying the Scriptural commandments to remain a separate people, and to not commit fornication (including race-mixing) produces "righteous fruit” and can only be, pure blooded, Adamic offspring!
With the “tree of life” then being a symbolic tree, it only makes sense that the “tree of knowledge of good and evil” was also intended as symbolic. Again people are often portrayed as trees in the Scriptures. Thus if Adamites can be branches upon the 'true vine' or 'the tree of life,' then those rebellious angels who were cast out and their descendants, can surely be the 'family' tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Before the Fall in Genesis 2:25, Adam and Eve were not ashamed of their nakedness. However, after the Fall (in Genesis 3:7-10), Adam and Eve were suddenly ashamed of their naked bodies. Why would they be ashamed of what was below their neck, if the sin they committed took place above it? Their shame was due to sex in the Garden and nothing else.
Back in Genesis 3:3 Eve tells satan that neither she nor Adam can "touch" the "fruit" of 'the tree of knowledge of good and evil,' or else, they'll die. The word "touch" means to lay hands upon... to lie with (Strong's Exhaustive Concordance #5060). When one lies with someone in this capacity, it's obviously sexual in nature.
The words "eat" or "ate" speak here of another type of consumption. The words "eat" or "ate" when used in the first 15 verses of Genesis chapter 3 means (literally or figurative) to consume... devour (Strong's Exhaustive Concordance #398). When you partake in something in this fashion, it means you are engaging in an activity. And Eve certainly did partake and engage herself here. She partook and engaged in sexual activity. Satan (the 'serpent') seduced Eve into racemixing, that's what happened in the Garden. In Genesis 3:13 we read that Eve when called in front of God to account for her misdeed said, "The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." The following is a verse that sheds tremendous Scriptural light on the imagery of what Eve did:
20 Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no wickedness.
This gives us the sense in which Eve "did eat". For Eve was 'beguiled' which means to lead estray...mentally to delude or morally to seduce (Strong's Exhaustive Concordance #5377). IT IS NOT IMMORAL , A MORAL SEDUCTION, TO TALK SOMEONE INTO EATING A PIECE OF FRUIT! The Apostle Paul used the example of Eve's moral seduction to amplify his concern for the assembly at Corinth, who were having problems with sexual sin.
II CORINTHIANS 11:1-3
1 Would to God ye could bear with me a little in my folly: and indeed bear with me. 2 For I am jealous over you in a godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. 3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtility, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
The Apostle Paul also makes reference to satan's ability to transform himself:
II CORINTHIANS 11:14
14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
This fits exactly with what we see the serpent doing in the Garden, in seducing Eve. This further confirms that the grand sin that led to the Fall in the Garden was sexual in nature. In Genesis 3:6 and 12, we see that Eve led Adam into having sex with her, after she had been with some one else, committing adultery. The Fall of Adamic man was a result of sex in the Garden, plain and simple.
Genesis 3:15 tells us that two genetic seedlines are to come forth from Eve. They are the seedline of satan and the seedline of the woman (with Adam), therefore there had to be one who fathered Cain other than Adam. Verse 15 also tells us that the two seedlines would be in direct conflict with one another and in the end, the satanic seedline will be crushed. And there is to be 'enmity' or major hatred between the two seedlines.
Also, the 'fruit' spoken of in these passages is not actual fruit like an apple or orange. The 'fruit' spoken of here is offspring, descendants. We know that a piece of fruit isn't the result of a sexual relationship between a male and a female.
It is interesting, that part of Eve's punishment is pain in childbirth instead of maybe, getting indigestion everytime she eats a piece of fruit. Her punishment goes right along with what she did. She'd had sex and was now pregnant and she would pay for her sin with pain when bearing the 'fruit.'
Genesis 3:15 alone points out the utter absurdity of the whole 'snake-fruit' Fall in the Garden, fairy tale. In Gen. 4:1-2, we read that Eve gave birth to Cain and Abel. Now Abel was Adam's son. But Cain was not! Cain is found nowhere in any geneaology in the Scriptures that traces back to Adam. Read Genesis 5:3-5; 1 Chronicles 1:1 and Luke 3:38. In Luke 3:38, it states that Adam was the son of God. Why is Cain not mentioned here, if he was an unpolluted descendant of Adam? Cain is not mentioned because he was not Adam's son. Cain was 'bad fruit' from 'the tree of knowledge of good and evil,' it's that simple.
In Genesis 4:8-12, we read of the enmity between the two seedlines which God predicted would occur: Cain murdered Abel. Later in Genesis 4:25 and 5:3, we read that Adam and Eve had a son named Seth. The name 'Seth' means 'substitute.' Seth was the 'substitute' for who? Abel! Remember, Cain was driven away from Adam and Eve. So why wasn't Seth a 'substitute' for Cain, since he was the eldest? The answer is simple. Cain was NOT Adam's son! Again in I John 3:12, we read who Cain's father is "that Wicked one". Seth was the replacement for Abel because Abel was Adam's only genetic son.
15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrits! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
Cain's descendants are mentioned frequently in the New Testament. Christ tells members of the jewish heirarchy that their race is responsible for the deaths of all the righteous that have been murdered on the earth and he begins the list of the righteous, with Abel. Who killed Abel? Cain killed Abel! This other 'family tree' was on the earth long before Adam, Eve, Cain and Abel. But Yahshua Christ clearly traces the bloodline of the righteous only through the white Adamic race.
33 Ye serpents, ye generation (race) of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
Jesus calls the edomite jews, "serpents". Remember God hates Esau because later on in Genesis, he too 'ate' of 'the tree of the knowledge of good and evil,' with the daughters of Heth. In the Genesis 15 Canaanite nations this is the same as 'the Hittites,' who mixed with the 'Kenites,' who are the descendants of Cain! This all resulted from sex in the Garden spoken of in Genesis 3. Christ also says that they are a hell-bound race of people and their fate is sealed at the end of verse 33.
In John 8:44, again, Jesus proclaimed "the devil" as being the edomite jews' genetic father. In Matthew 23:15, we see Yahshua Christ stating that judaism (known then as the "traditions of the elders") is a religion of hell! It is exactly what the modern jews have used to alter a constitutional republic into a communist, babylonian talmudic jewtopia!
9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blashemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to now that I have loved thee.
Do you want to know what pleases Christ? Just do what the Israelites did in these assemblies: expose the jews for the imposters that they are! The impostors Christ refers to as the "synagogue of Satan" in reality are the ancestors of the modern jews. If you recognize this truth, then you are not only in agreement with these two assemblies of the seven, but with Christ. Failure to expose the jews as imposters has led to the 'leaven of the Pharisees' or most of the unscriptural teachings found in judeochristianity.
If one does not recognize that the Fall of our race was thru sex in the Garden, they will not arrived at the knowledge of the truth. Christ has revealed it, and the Apostles affirm it over and over throughout the New Testament.
As we've seen before, the world's paradigm is not in line with Yahweh. The distinction being made between jews and all non-jews, giving jews a false position of pre-imminence, is against the Scriptures. As we are seeing repeatedly in the Bible, Yahweh's divide is between whites and non-white; sheep and goats, good fish and bad fish, wheat and tares, sons and bastards. He sees the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent. He sees those He created and those who are the works of the devil, thar is all.